The Five Moves That Make or Break a Research Introduction

Every research paper begins with a small act of persuasion. Before the methods, before the data, before the argument, there is one crucial section that determines whether your work will be read seriously or merely skimmed. That section is the introduction. Editors read it quickly. They read it critically. Within moments, they decide whether your paper shows clarity, confidence, and purpose.

Many writers think an introduction should tell a story. In truth, it should perform a sequence of deliberate moves. Each move carries a specific weight: showing that your topic matters, that you understand the existing field, that you have a focused plan, that your method is sound, and that your contribution adds something new.

Move One: Begin with the Immediate Problem

The opening paragraph should make readers care. Begin with something real and tangible. Ground your problem in the world of law, policy, or lived experience. In environmental law, for instance, that might mean the persistent problem of corporate pollution or the curious gap between dense regulations and weak enforcement.

Avoid sweeping declarations about “saving the planet” or “the future of humanity.” Editors encounter those phrases too often. Instead, make your opening precise. Point to the contradiction, the tension, the failure that calls for explanation. If you can express it in one clear sentence, how rules exist yet harm continues, you have already achieved more than most.

Move Two: Expose the Scholarly Gap

Once the problem is established, turn to the scholarship. Show that you know the major debates and schools of thought that shape your field. Then, reveal what they overlook. Perhaps planetary justice theory pays too little attention to African legal pluralism. Perhaps corporate accountability research assumes a Western institutional framework. Whatever the oversight, name it directly.

This is not just a literature review; it is a claim of intellectual space. You are signaling that you understand the landscape and that your paper will take it somewhere new. The best test is to ask yourself, “Could a reviewer accuse me of ignoring an important body of work?” If not, you have passed a vital threshold.

Move Three: Ask Focused Questions

By now your paper has direction, but it needs precision. Narrow your scope and ask one or two well-defined research questions. Avoid piling up sub-questions. Simplicity reads as confidence.

You might ask, “How do plural legal systems in African jurisdictions shape corporate environmental accountability? What implications does this hold for transnational regulation?” Such questions carve a clean analytical path. They make clear what your paper will examine and what it will leave aside.

Move Four: Demonstrate Method and Design

This is often the paragraph that decides whether your paper survives the first editorial screening. Editors and reviewers want to see how you plan to answer your questions. State your approach plainly, whether it is normative, doctrinal, comparative, or empirical. Clarity here matters far more than jargon.

Explain why you chose your particular cases or jurisdictions. Justify your design choices. Readers should come away believing that your method is deliberate and appropriate, not accidental or improvised. Method is not a mere formality; it is proof that your analysis stands on solid ground.

Move Five: Claim Your Contribution

Now comes the moment of persuasion. Tell the reader what difference your work makes and why it belongs in the broader conversation. Describe your contribution clearly, then sketch a brief roadmap of what follows.

Perhaps your study introduces legal pluralism as a new lens for understanding corporate accountability. Perhaps it reinterprets the effectiveness of environmental regulation through a comparative frame. Whatever the insight, say it with conviction. Editors appreciate honesty and clarity far more than inflated claims of originality.

The Discipline of Design

Good research writing is not about passion alone. It is about design. A strong method gives your work credibility. A clear structure turns that credibility into persuasion. And restraint, the ability to leave out what does not belong, is the mark of intellectual maturity.

Ambition matters, but ambition without clarity becomes noise. A well-designed introduction disciplines your ambition. It transforms it into something editors can trust and readers can follow.

Why the Introduction Comes Last

Although the introduction appears first, most experienced scholars write it last. It sets the tone and defines the argument, but it can only do that once the rest of the paper is fully formed. Writing the introduction too early can trap you in premature claims. Writing it last allows you to tell the truth about what your paper actually achieves.

When you begin, your introduction is a rough map. It records what you hope to find. As your research unfolds, the terrain changes. You discover new evidence, refine your methods, or adjust your theoretical frame. By the end, that first map no longer matches the path you have walked. You must redraw it.

Experienced writers follow a few quiet habits. They draft the introduction early to clarify their thoughts, but they expect to rewrite it completely. They craft the final version after the results are clear, making sure that every promise aligns with what the paper delivers. They frame the argument, but they resist the urge to forecast every detail.

The introduction, in the end, is not a trailer. It is a threshold. It invites readers into the logic of your paper and shows them why the work exists at all.

The Scolar’s Rhythm

Writing a research paper is a rhythm, not a straight line. You begin in curiosity, move through discovery, and return to explanation. The introduction is where that rhythm resolves. It is the point at which your argument finally introduces itself to the world.

Draft it first if you must, but write it last. Only then will it carry the authority of a paper that truly knows what it has become.

Adekunle Saheed Akinola is a researcher with expertise in international environmental law and policy, focusing on the right to development, the transition to a green economy, and the rights of indigenous communities. He also specializes in comparative international human rights, particularly women’s and minority rights, as well as international investment law. Adekunle provides mentorship to early researchers and students in research paper writing, drafting conference abstracts, and developing Master’s and PhD theses. He is committed to helping scholars communicate their ideas clearly, structure their work effectively, and navigate academic submissions with confidence.

Contact:
Email: choicelandsolicitors9@gmail.com
Mobile: +2348032493960
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5346-8773